Skip to content

[release-4.18] OCPBUGS-41880: Fix namespace retention between NetworkPolicies tabs when MultiNetworkPolicies are disabled#433

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
openshift:release-4.18from
pcbailey:bug-fix/41880--ns-retention-broken-when-multintwkpolicies-disabled
Jun 17, 2026
Merged

[release-4.18] OCPBUGS-41880: Fix namespace retention between NetworkPolicies tabs when MultiNetworkPolicies are disabled#433
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
openshift:release-4.18from
pcbailey:bug-fix/41880--ns-retention-broken-when-multintwkpolicies-disabled

Conversation

@pcbailey

@pcbailey pcbailey commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fix namespace retention between NetworkPolicies tabs when MultiNetworkPolicies are disabled.

Jira: https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OCPBUGS-41880

Demo:

networkPolicies-retain-namespace-4.18--2026-06-16-08-57-23.mp4

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 16, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@pcbailey: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-41880, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Fix namespace retention between NetworkPolicies tabs when MultiNetworkPolicies are disabled.

Jira: https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OCPBUGS-41880

Demo:

networkPolicies-retain-namespace-4.18--2026-06-16-08-57-23.mp4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 0d03091a-4644-4bf7-b232-625c9a90fc68

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from avivtur and metalice June 16, 2026 13:04
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 16, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@pcbailey: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@pcbailey

pcbailey commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 16, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@pcbailey: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-41880, which is valid.

9 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.18.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.18.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-41605 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-41605 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-41605 targets the "4.19.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.19.0, 4.19.z
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-41605 targets the "4.19.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.19.0, 4.19.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @lkladnit

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested a review from lkladnit June 16, 2026 20:35
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 17, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: avivtur, pcbailey

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit bdabc5f into openshift:release-4.18 Jun 17, 2026
5 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@pcbailey: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-41880: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-41880 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Fix namespace retention between NetworkPolicies tabs when MultiNetworkPolicies are disabled.

Jira: https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OCPBUGS-41880

Demo:

networkPolicies-retain-namespace-4.18--2026-06-16-08-57-23.mp4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@avivtur avivtur avivtur approved these changes

@metalice metalice Awaiting requested review from metalice

@lkladnit lkladnit Awaiting requested review from lkladnit

Assignees

@avivtur avivtur

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@pcbailey @openshift-ci-robot @avivtur